Today’s New York Times had a front page article on Bloomberg’s education reform policies.
Mostly, it shows that some of his reforms have worked, and other reforms have not. I can’t say I’m surprised. Part of the problem is the assumption that we can know what effects an educational reform has had after one year. I’d argue that you can see bad results quickly, but good results often take a longer time to emerge.
And that’s part of the problem with the politicization of education reform. The political timeline and educational timeline don’t really match up — especially when you are talking about progressive reform. How long did it take Beacon to get to a point where we felt like our graduation portfolio process to where it represented the best of students’ academic experiences at Beacon? We probably got there four or five years into my tenure at Beacon… but how long did it take to force us to totally change it in response to the new Regents? One year.
There’s more to say here… and I’ll continue it tomorrow, but for now, sleep beckons.