| Who I am: Chris Lehmann
What I do: Principal of the Science Leadership Academy in Philadelphia, PA (Opening 9/06). What I did: Technology Coordinator / English Teacher / Girls Basketball Coach / Ultimate Coach at the Beacon School, a fantastic progressive public high school in Manhattan. Email: chris [at] practicaltheory [dot] org. Subscribe to Practical TheoryCreative CommonsBlog AdministrationSyndicate This Blog |
< Leadership Day 2010: Be The Best Version of Yourself | SLA Named One of the Ten Most Amazing Schools in US (and other news!) >
Monday, August 9. 2010The Big Lie (Thoughts on Why School Is Not Only About Workforce Development)[This post is finally finding its voice after kicking around in my brain for most of the summer because of the amazing work of Umair Haque and his post A Deeper Kind of Joblessness.] I knew a lot of very smart, very academically successful kids when I was growing up. I went to CTY which was a rather humbling experience, and then I went to pretty high-powered college. And I knew a lot of kids who worked hard, got good grades, and got to the job market and realized that no one really cared. In the workplace, they were just the next 22 year old, and there was intro-level work to be done, and little of it really required that BA in Eastern European literature. My generation came of age with Douglas Coupland's Generation X, and Coupland's refrain of "You Are Not Your Job" made a lot of sense to me then... and I find myself reflecting on it a great deal lately. A frequent refrain of mine is that the purpose of public education is not the creation of the 21st Century workforce, but rather, the co-creation - in conjunction with our students - of 21st Century citizens. I really believe that "work" is a subset of "citizen," and that if we aim for citizenship, we'll get the workforce we need, but aiming for creating workers won't get our society the citizens it needs. A public education that centers first around workforce development will put a high premium on following directions and doing what you're told. A public education that centers first around citizenship development will still teach rules, but it will teach students to question the underlying ideas behind the rules. Workforce development will reinforce the hierarchies that we see in most corporate culture, while a citizenship-focus will teach students that their voice matters, regardless of station. It's not just about what society needs, it's also about what students need. We completely change the lens of "Why do we need to study this" when the answer deals with being an informed and active citizen as opposed to what we do with our work life, because let's be honest with ourselves, most people don't need calculus, the Periodic Table of Elements or the date of the signing of the Magna Carta to be a good worker. But you do need to understand statistical analysis to read fivethirtyeight.com and make sense of the political conversations there, you do need to understand basic chemistry to understand how the oil in the Gulf disaster affects the region, and understanding how England evolved from a pure aristocracy to a constitutional monarchy which did sow the seeds of the American democracy might help to make sense of our own country's history. The goal of a citizenship-driven education exposes students to ideas that will challenge them, push them, and help them to make sense of a confusing world. And more to the point - we don't lie to kids when we say that's what high school is for. Our society is changing, and there are some serious warning signs that our economy be fundamentally shifting in ways that will make it harder and harder for education to be "the great equalizer." Children across the socio-economic spectrum are realizing that the economic "sell" of public education isn't ringing true. As college costs creep over $200,000 for private colleges and over $100,000 for public colleges (Penn State's costs, with room and board, this year was $27,000 / yr in-state) and as more jobs move to labor markets that do not have the high wages of the United States (seriously, read Haque's post... it reminds me of a shorter, more digestible version of Joseph Stiglitz's work,) the idea that all kids who work hard in high school will have economic success in life is more and more of a lie. I think - I fear - that the next twenty or thirty years of American life are going to be difficult. I think we're going to have some really challenging problems to solve, and I think that we're going to be faced with hard choices about our lives, and I want our schools to help students be ready to solve those problems, to weigh-in on those problems, to vote on those problems. It's why History and Science are so important. It's why kids have to learn how to create and present their ideas in powerful ways. It's why kids have to become critical consumers and producers of information. And hopefully, along the way, they find the careers that will help them build sustainable, enjoyable, productive lives. I want to be honest about why we teach what we teach. I'm tired of schools and politicians implicitly promising that the result of successful schooling is high wages. And I'm tired of us forgetting everything else that goes into helping people realize their potential in the process. Teaching kids that hard work in school will mean more money is a shortcut and an example of the shoddy logic that doesn't ring true to many kids. Teaching kids that hard work in school will help them develop skills that will help them be a more fully realized citizen and person is a harder argument to make, but it stands a much better chance of being true. Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Great post. I think about this topic frequently because of our advocacy work around 21st century skills where the workforce development angle can play a very prominent role in framing the conversation and sometimes in a really flat way. You're totally right that citizenship is one of the biggest issues of our time. Crafting a well-considered life - how do we instill that through education? How can we make this the driving vision for being educated rather than material rewards? Good stuff.
Don't you think it works both ways, though? My own learning path has been as influenced (positively) by the world of work as almost anything else. I grew up in a rural farming community where some of my most pivotal learning experiences happened to occur through the labor/work/jobs I pursued. I have to say, I learned more about people, life and citizenship from those experiences than from my History teacher who was there because he was the football coach, not because he had a passion (or talent) for teaching the subject.. My college path was--thankfully--a much richer academic experience but I'm still keenly aware of how little some education environments have to offer by way of real learning, especially when compared to what can be learned in applied workplace settings. Formal schooling can and should help create the habits of mind for good citizenship, no argument there. It shouldn't be reduced to a paycheck payoff. But I think the world of work can (and should, and in some cases does) do this, too, and I think an equivalent challenge to the one you pose is to include workplaces as part of the equation. Being able to think critically, solve problems, parse information, act ethically in the service of a larger good, be engaged in the larger world...these are things that are needed overwhelmingly in workplaces and communities alike. Anyway, your post made me think about how we should cast the net a little wider, and ask whether we have the capacity to rethink how our communities and their respective institutions--libraries, museums, schools and workplaces--are addressing things like the challenges of 21st century citizenship. What connects all these ways of learning? How do they collectively contribute to developing more intrinsic, not extrinsic, motivation(s) for life and work? It's pretty interesting, I think. Thanks for your post - that was fun to think about. Valerie Thanks for the post and links.
I wonder how we can be so passionate about education for [democratic] citizenship, and yet Federal programs such as Race to the Top go in a different direction. For example, the first goal for RttT prioritizes economy: "Through Race to the Top, we are asking States to advance reforms around four specific areas: 1) Adopting standards and assessments that prepare students to succeed in college and the workplace and to compete in the global economy (emphasis added)... For more on RttT, check out the link: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/index.html As always, a provocative and blatantly honest post. My favorite part is your plea for students to "create" information. As we look at education and the flow of information in our world today, we need to realize that school is all about information. We need to teach our kids how to find, vet, assimilate, connect and create information. And then we need to teach them how to destruct and unlearn that creation, only to assemble it again. That will help lead to an informed citizenry, one flexible enough to embrace new ideas and challenges, yet confident enough to be able to continue to progress without a hitch.
I don't see a conflict. The assumption that education for the workforce means following rules, knowledge-level busy work and no creativity are a hold over from the industrial age. A flawed assumption that is unfortunately held by policymakers and teachers alike.
The reality is the important critical thinking and creative skills that are required for good citizenship, are the same skills students will need to enter the entrepreneur class. Creativity has always been the strength of the American economy, and - as you say - with cheaper labor available on the global market, invention and creation are our students' best path to prosperity. In this way education for citizenship is education for the workforce. We just have to rethink how we view the workforce. I enjoy your plea for honesty, and agree that citizenship is larger and more important than employment, but I don't know if there is a need to think about these two idea in competition. A close look at 21st Century Skills and other similar efforts that prepare students for work really prepare students for college, career, and citizenship readiness.
"Teaching kids that hard work in school will help them develop skills that will help them be a more fully realized citizen and person is a harder argument to make, but it stands a much better chance of being true."
I agree. However, in too many schools this ideal is far from true. Textbooks, worksheets, and lectures will not help students develop important skills. We need more schools like the SLA in order to make this a reality. Chris, such a timely post, and it echoes some thinking that I've been doing this week as well. I appreciate the links to Omar Haque and Joseph Stiglitz and look forward to investigating them for additional inspiration.
My family spent the last week in Washington, DC, and I had the opportunity to reflect on the origins of our country and the original purpose and goals of public education. Particularly inspiring to me was our visit to the Library of Congress, which originally was just to be a research library for our elected officials. Forward thinking made the founders realize that open access to knowledge was essential to a functioning democracy, and so the LoC was created with a much broader mission. I think many people have lost touch with those roots. "I want to be honest about why we teach what we teach. I'm tired of schools and politicians implicitly promising that the result of successful schooling is high wages."
This is a symptom of a larger societal issue. Consider how any sort of education that doesn't produce monetary value is therefore considered valueless. For example, think of jokes about liberal arts majors working at minimum wage jobs. I'm all for teaching for citizenship. I'm also with the above commenters who suggest that teaching for work readiness is not necessarily a bad thing. The stories I hear from 20-something friends in the workforce is that employers prize initiative and creativity -- just doing what you're told is no longer sufficient nor ubiquitous in successful businesses.
Teaching children to be lifelong learners helps them choose a rewarding career path. I have most enjoyed hearing stories of graduates who chose less popular, lower-paying jobs out of college but then turned them into magnificent careers through their creativity and persistence. Great post, Chris, and I was especially struck by your definition of education as "co-creating" knowledge when I saw you say it to a large group of educators last week.
I think that the secrete underlying this particular conversation is that children who are prepared to be responsible, contributing, and passionate members of their society, will also, with the same skills and attitudes, be responsible contributors to the workplace, especially in this time of rapid change. Shifting more toward the workforce angle, I've been wondering about the idea of a turn-around, where employers avoid the straight A students, leaning more toward C & D students, who are obviously bright but not willing (or able) to conform. Just an idea... at the end of the day we want good kids who can think for themselves and contribute in a positive way to the community and workplace. As I tell staff, I would rather produce "good kids" who can't identify where the Niger River is, then have a school full of "know it alls" who lack empathy for others.
A question was posed to several scholars about the purpose of community colleges. Do you think that community colleges are designed to only to develop the workforce, offer classes that will get people back to work in this terrible economy or prepare students to meet the global demands of our society.
Well put. Although I don't believe that you are saying traditional workplace education contradicts civic education, but that only doing "follow the directions, memorize and regurgitate" isn't enough. If I'm wrong, I must be projecting.
Great post. I'm going to keep an eye on your blog. Interesting post. I think you make some great points about re-examining the role of schools in this country for the coming decades.
One thing that concerns me, however, is the ambiguity of the term "citizenship." I've heard a lot about preparing students to be citizens in a 21st century America, but very little specificity about what that truly means. Obama's ESEA blueprint talks about citizenship, but doesn't outline any specific curriculum for fulfilling that goal (thankfully). My question, then, is what are the types of things we should be teaching students to prepare them to be valuable citizens? Do we teach things like ethics, personal finance, and American government? What about religion, sports, and nutrition? I completely agree with your ideas about WHAT schools need to do; I'm curious as to HOW schools should go about it. I have one in 10th grade and one just starting in 1st grade. I wonder about the same things for our students and my own children, always stressing the fact that school is not about getting good grades, or making as much money when they are older. Education is about quality of life, for you and everyone around you.
College costs are just crazy now, and from the return on investment, http://is.gd/ehBJc , there are bound to be alternatives. great stuff - the education system is asked to produce good little workers...a pet peeve of mine also....check out the latest post on my blog, it touches on that topic
Hi
I think your posting is interesting. With the lose of family instruction teaching , such things as ethics, personal finance, to students It is no wonder that the 21st centry education is so out of focus of what is "really " happening . I think that the schools should include courses that would teach its students to live in the "real " world of finding, holding a job and the ablity of communicating face to face to each other, which we seem to have gotten lost in the world of computers. Chris,
You write: "A public education that centers first around workforce development will put a high premium on following directions and doing what you're told." That attitude -- "do what you're told" was a perfect fit for the workforce of the industrialized society and even the post WW2 workforce. But in how many jobs will you thrive today if you just "do as you are told"? I'd most certainly agree that schools should educate people to be good citizens. But it's significantly easier to be a "good citizen" when you've got enough money in your wallet to buy dinner. As parents, we want our children to thrive on their own -- and that means they have to be able to earn their keep. But here's the kicker: the most dramatic change going on right now is in the workforce itself. You won't thrive if you simply "do as you're told." We're seeing more people become independent contractors, either by choice or by necessity. Independent contractors have to think for themselves. So we need to teach creative, independent thinking both because it's a societal good -- and because our children's future livelihoods depend on it. This is not about kowtowing to industry. It's about figuring out how to prosper in a dramatically different environment than the post WW2 world offered. Great post. I actually think about this a lot. Regardless of whatever faults anyone can say about SLA, I can honestly say that this school has shaped me into a better citizen. There were times throughout high school when I may not have made the right choices (and any other school might have even had me expelled), but you never gave up on me. That and the invitation to help with school events and projects have given me a sense of a purpose, which has translated to better academic success. Thanks for everything.
Add Comment
|
The Book!What School Leaders Need to Know About Digital Technologies and Social Media - Edited by Chris Lehmann and Scot McLeod
Calendar
The Quote File"A life is not important except for the impact it has on other lives" QuicksearchTwit ThisCategories |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||






Comments
Mon, 25.03.2013 14:05
Jon Goldman was both my
English Teacher in 9th
grade and Advisory Mentor
for my four years at
[...]
Karen Greenberg about Saving Lives v. Changing Lives
Tue, 14.08.2012 11:13
Perhaps a more apt term
would be "altering
trajectories". Think
physics - two objects in
motion [...]
Amethyst about Saving Lives v. Changing Lives
Mon, 13.08.2012 22:51
I really appreciate this
blog entry. Our roles as
teachers require, at our
best, a deep [...]
Mark Ahlness about The Long Haul
Mon, 13.08.2012 22:33
Chris, thanks. Pete is my
hero, and has been for a
while, but now that I'm
retired, after 31 years
[...]
Gary Stager about Saving Lives v. Changing Lives
Mon, 13.08.2012 22:15
Chris,
No need to worry about
semantic arguments.
Others all around us are
debasing our [...]