Now that Wesley Clark has thrown his hat into the Presidental ring, I’m finally getting around to posting Michael Moore’s open letter to Gen. Clark.
Got to say, it’s a powerful piece of writing that did a lot (more) to convince me that Gen. Clark is someone worth listening to in this process. A pro-choice, gun-control, liberal Democrat four-star General with charisma to boot is a serious threat to Bush, and also, it seems, has potential to be an excellent president.
It seems, for the first time since 1992, there are some real options in the primaries for the liberals.
So, I’ve started keeping a blog for my New Media class. This is an elective class that meets twice a week that has for the last few years frustrated me because the practice side of the class (making short films) has gone great, but the theory side (thinking about media critically) has been less than I’d hoped for.
Blogging seems like a good solution. Today’s entry was a good question, albiet somewhat vague… 1) What role does mass-media play in your life and 2) what influence does it have over you?
It was a deliberately open-ended question, and as you can see, the answers run from well thought-out to "Why is Lehmann making me do this when I really just want to check my Yahoo Fantasy Baseball team?"
But it’s not a bad opening salvo, methinks.
My goal for this blog is ask the kids to, once a week, deconstruct a piece of media — TV show, movie, magazine — and critically analyze it. I’m still thinking about what the questions that I include in that critical log are, but I think that a) it’s a great exercise to have to do — one I will try to do myself — and b) by making it a public blog instead of private forum, we create new media while critiquing it, which is cool.
This one almost slipped under the radar… but Kerry caught it, and then I saw CNN’s follow-up article on it.
I have been following the political mess down in Texas since it started. The GOP in Texas, under the direction of U.S. Congressman Tom Delay, have been downright naked in their attempt to change the rules to suit their own purpose — in this case redistricting three years after the last time instead of ten years, because it would give the GOP more seats in the U. S. House of Representatives. I admired the Democrats who were willing to go into exile for the past few months in order to bring this issue to the light of day.
So, I read with mixed emotions the news that the Texas Ten (they were 11) had returned. One problem is, of course, that they will probably lose. The only things that would keep the GOP from enacting the redistricting is tradition, a sense of propriety or really bad PR. DeLay and Rove have shown that they don’t care about either of the first two, and somehow, this issue is just esoteric enough to not capture America’s attention.
ESPN.com reports that, on the eve of the Women’s World Cup, the U.S. women’s soccer league, the WUSA, is shutting down. This both saddens and frustrates me because I know so many Beacon girls’ soccer players loved the WUSA.
As a coach of a girls basketball team, I have been following the WUSA and the WNBA with really high hopes. On some level, it bothers me that it’s going to take successful professional leagues for women’s sports to truly be embraced by mainstream America, but that’s probably the truth. Until then, lots of girls are going to have to keep fighting to convince people that they play a "real" sport.
Even at Beacon, where women’s sports are respected and thrive, it’s taken several years for the boys’ basketball coaches to finally put "Boys Basketball" on their signs, rather than just "The Basketball Team." (And thank you, John and Ninji, for not thinking I was crazy for bugging you about that.) But it’s still true in a lot of schools that girls sports are not taken seriously or the female athletes do not get the respect the boys do.
The exposure of the WNBA and the WUSA raised the bar. There’s a lot of baggage that goes with pro sports, but women’s pro sports have changed the way a lot of young girls have looked at themselves… their identities… their bodies. I went to a WUSA event last year, and to see the way the young girls looked at the athletes was to realize what power having a pro league had.
On the eve of the Women’s World Cup, it’s a shame that the WUSA couldn’t find a way to stay viable. Perhaps the WWC will respark the league, but even if it does, it appears that both major women’s sports leagues will have to struggle to survive in the immediate future.
And what message does that send to our young female athletes?
[Updated: ESPN.com has published another story talking about much the same ideas that I was writing about here.]
I’m sure this article is getting linked by bloggers all over the country… and personally, I’m hoping that Brad DeLong comments on the article, but I felt I had to post it up too.
Paul Krugman’s piece, The Tax-Cut Con, in today’s NY Times Magazine is required reading to understand both the philosophies that are behind the tax-cut mania that has been around since the days of Reagan and what those policies have done and continue to do to our country.
We are slowly but surely (and not that slowly anymore, really) starving our country while we allow an elite few to garner a higher and higher percentage of the nation’s wealth. Krugman’s piece debunks a lot of myths about who is helped by tax cuts, and I’m hoping that everyone who reads it gets just a little more angry about the direction our country has been taken since 1980.
In this week’s New Yorker, Malcolm Gladwell writes a great short piece about the problems of the current "standards movement" in education. While the data he uses is nothing new, what I loved about the piece was how he compared the current movement to the industrial-efficency movement of one hundred years ago. The problem, as Gladwell states, is:
The only problem, of courseand its not a trivial oneis that children arent widgets
It’s a great quick read. And all the data points coming out against NCLB these days lead us to ask an overwhelming question:
Who is actually for this bill?
[This blog entry comes from an assignment in my Restructuring Urban Schools class -- the assignment was this: Write a three page paper describing your ideal urban school. This is my take on the assignment. Remember -- I only had three pages, so there's a lot missing here, I think.]
Within these walls, we are governed by the laws of loving-kindness. In college, I had a professor who started his class with this statement. He knew he couldnt control the way people treated one another in the outside world, but within his class, he asked us all to live by the tenets of loving-kindness. This was not a course I wanted to take it was a required course of the English department for all English majors. But in the end, I looked forward to his class every day and I was very sad when it ended. Why? Upon reflection, it was because there was a community of learning in that room that was a pleasure to be there. I wanted to learn in that classroom, because there was a community there that was conductive to learning. My ideal school is one that is structured based on the inter-related ethical values of loving-kindness and democracy.
I probably should just collect a bunch of this stuff into one big blog, because there’s certainly a ton of commentary out there to read today… but this one really stuck out. It’s Mark Fiore’s flash editorial cartoon A Nation Remembers II.
Personally, there’s something about this that strikes me as going over a line somewhere, but I also thought there was no denying its power as a piece of commentary. And it is a rather scathing indictment of the President.
Swarthmore professor, author and internet denizen Tim Burke has written a wonderful essay on why you don’t have to be against the war on terrorism or even against the idea of war to depose Saddam Hussein to be angry as hell at the Bush Administration.